Transmission – Tsadra Conferences https://conference.tsadra.org Buddhist Conferences Thu, 17 Nov 2022 06:40:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.11 Lotsawa Translation Workshop Opening Remarks https://conference.tsadra.org/session/opening-remarks/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:20:45 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17221 Conference organizers Holly Gayley (University of Colorado, Boulder) and Dominique Townsend (Bard College) welcome participants and mentors. Holly thanks Tsadra Foundation for supporting the conference, and shares her inspiration for facilitating sustained dialogue about various genres of Tibetan literature. Dominique introduces the venerable speakers for the opening keynote.

Marcus Perman, Director of Research for Tsadra Foundation, encourages translators in their work by articulating the relevance of translated publications for the Western Tibetan Buddhist audience. Ending with a moment of silence for two bright translators who recently passed away (Chris Stagg and Gen Tsering Dhundup Gongkatsang), Marcus helps start the workshop with a reflective tone, an appropriate ground upon which to introduce the keynote dialogue with Janet Gyatso and Kurtis Schaeffer.

]]>
The State of the Field https://conference.tsadra.org/session/the-state-of-the-field/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:19:05 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17225 Kurtis Schaeffer (University of Virginia) begins a reflective conversation about the State of the Field of Tibetan translation by acknowledging Janet Gyatso’s book Apparitions of the Self (1998). Kurtis notes that the work has fueled discussion about embodied engagement with literature that takes form and style in literature seriously. Since its release, it has inspired workshops and served as the basis of other significant work on the impact of thought, philosophy, and devotion on literary production.

The two scholars continue by contextualizing a major theme of current translation work: the fact that we can now focus on Tibetan literature as literature. Janet Gyatso (Harvard) reminds the audience to step back from the question of translation–before we become good translators, we need to be good readers and appreciators.

Janet follows her own example by giving a short presentation on her collaboration with Pema Bum, a Tibetan intellectual and scholar of literature, on three examples of verse that illustrate the literary technology found in Daṇḍin’s Mirror of Poetry (Kāvyādarśa, Tib. snyan ngak me long), an Indian text that exerted significant influence on Tibetan literature. Kurtis then acknowledges the humanness that can emerge from poetry–the social and interpersonal aspects evinced through these literary techniques–and reminds us to attend to the sensuousness and humor of the artform, and the awe evoked by the experience of it.

]]>
Criteria for Beauty and Readability https://conference.tsadra.org/session/criteria-for-beauty-and-readability/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:18:17 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17227 When assessing the beauty and readability of a translation one might pose the following questions: does the text come alive in the target language? Is there a distinct emotional tone that comes through in the translation? Does a chosen grammatical structure have the power to convey what we are trying to convey? How do we summon that power to our work?

In this breakout group, Amelia Hall and Andrew Schelling, colleagues at Naropa University in Boulder, CO, address these questions and discuss the importance of techniques to invoke the power of the creative act of translation. They encourage the translator to remain receptive and trust in the genius of his or her own contemporary language to deliver both beauty and readability.

]]>
Uncontrived Elegance in Tibetan Songs https://conference.tsadra.org/session/uncontrived-elegance-in-tibetan-songs/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:17:08 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17228 John Canti (Padmakara, 84000) and Sarah Harding (Tsadra Foundation) explore “uncontrived elegance” in poetry and song in Tibetan literature. Compared to the purportedly spontaneous composition of the original, is a translation ever uncontrived? John draws on examples from Dudjom Lingpa and Shabkar to illustrate the possibilities of translation and the evocative dimensions that can be expressed based on the source literature. Sarah suggests that a smooth, readable translation, facilitating ease of comprehension, may be the best we can do. After a lively discussion, Sarah leads the group in translating a short line of text to illustrate their points.

]]>
An Act of Bardo: Translating Tibetan Poetry https://conference.tsadra.org/session/an-act-of-bardo-translating-tibetan-poetry/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:15:09 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17231 Lama Jabb (Oxford) delivers this ground-breaking keynote lecture at the 2018 Lotsawa Translation Workshop. He weaves the extended metaphor of liminal space (bar do) throughout and softly punctuates his illumination of the translation process with insights from highly respected poets from numerous cultures while diligently considering the challenges and opportunities presented by the de- and reconstruction of languages. As he guides the audience through his translation choices, he explains his aims of preservation of cultural identity while delivering, with kindness, artistic richness to the reader. Ultimately questioning how translators can communicate in words that which is ineffable, Lama Jabb encourages the stalwart–those who struggle for the sake of human expression. His talk is an act of fortification, and encouragement for those brave enough to approach the arduous and meticulous task of translation to persevere despite the possibility that the poetic consciousness might remain lost in the bardo.

]]>
Dynamics of Devotion https://conference.tsadra.org/session/dynamics-of-devotion/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:14:53 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17241 Andrew Quintman (Wesleyan), Lara Braitstein (McGill), Heidi Nevin (Independent), Anne Klein (Rice), Holly Gayley (University of Colorado, Boulder), and Annabella Pitkin (Lehigh) take on the topic of devotion in translation. Annabella Pitkin skillfully facilitates discussion focused on three themes: literary and embodied devotion, translation as an act of devotion, and the cultural translation of devotion. Regarding the first, the group considers what terms are particularly difficult to unpack in English, posing questions like, “How does language serve to dictate devotion?”, and, “How does literature and its utterance help mediate the distance between subject and object?” While translators are positioned as well-intentioned authorities, translation as an act of devotion relates to the ethos of the translator approaching the translation of devotional literature and how translators might perform their craft in service to particular communities of practice. Finally, the panel discusses how to translate a concept like devotion across language communities and cultural differences acknowledging the role of the translator to guide or teach based on his or her choices. These topics elicit enthusiastic participation from the audience and a lively discussion ensues.

]]>
Collections of Songs (mgur ‘bum) https://conference.tsadra.org/session/collections-of-songs-mgur-bum/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:13:53 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17234 By taking a bird’s-eye view of collections of songs (mgur ‘bum), Kurtis Schaeffer (University of Virginia) and Andrew Quintman (Wesleyan) examine gaps in our knowledge based on the extant collections and their experiences both as translators and as historians of literature. They elicit an exploratory discussion by beginning with a series of key questions and positing ways in which we can think about songs as an autonomous literary form as well as how we might approach the provenance of songs and the process of their production and reproduction from the standpoint of history, in addition to other stimulating topics. What were the earliest song collections (mgur ‘bum)? When did they appear and how were they constituted? What are non-Kagyu examples of such collections?

]]>
Gender in Translating Devotional Verse https://conference.tsadra.org/session/gender-in-translating-devotional-verse/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:12:03 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17237 In this collaborative discussion breakout session, Jue Liang (University of Virginia) and Natasha Mikles (Texas State) discuss the dynamics of socially constructed ideas about gender on our readings of classical texts and biographies. The group also explores devotion as a culturally constructed idea and devotional language as gendered. Jue and Natasha lead the group in developing “word banks” of terms that elicit a mood of binary gender constructs and then the discussion naturally unfolds into thoughtful exploration of the deconstruction of the binary and a consideration of the opposites of gender and devotion and the value we place on all of these concepts.

]]>
Linguistic Hospitality https://conference.tsadra.org/session/linguistic-hospitality/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:11:08 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17233 Dominique Townsend (Bard) and Lucas Carmichael (University of Colorado, Boulder) present Paul Ricoeur’s essay, “On Translation“, as a starting point for discussion of linguistic hospitality. After a brief introduction to the essay, small group discussions on the ethics of translation, the dynamics of retranslation, and “resistance to the foreign” focus the conversation. The small groups then share a summary of their exploration and find that Ricoeur’s optimism in his encouragement to give up the idea of a perfect translation became the basis for small group conversation and further discussion.

]]>
Rasa Theory and Affect https://conference.tsadra.org/session/rasa-theory-and-affect/ Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:10:23 +0000 http://conference-wp.tsadra.org/?post_type=session&p=17240 Nancy Lin (84000) and Annabella Pitkin (Lehigh) lead a rich discussion about how rasa and affect theories might help translators of Tibetan appreciate and communicate about art and literature in English, particularly regarding the more subtle aspects of tone, mood, and feeling in a given work. Nancy begins by facilitating a discussion of a particular verse to develop a shared vocabulary for rasa theory. She then presents potential understandings of rasa through consideration of Bharata’s Treatise on Drama and Daṇḍin’s Mirror of Poetry and employs this shared vocabulary in a conversation about the work of Tibetan authors. Annabella poses compelling questions about how we describe the indescribable experience and how we might valorize the experience we have when reading or translating from the Tibetan in order to reproduce that experience in English. The facilitators suggest that making efforts toward developing an integral vocabulary for rasa theory and affect theory could help translators continue to deepen the richness of description for emotional experience.

]]>